Just curious to hear how folks are working with their digital cameras.

If you are shooting RAW, what RAW processing software do you use?

No point in buying a Ferrari and driving the speed limit. I always shoot raw, ALWAYS.

Lightroom and, less frequently, PS CS3/ACR.

always RAW.

I tend to use nikon's basic progam, altho, i have been fooling around with a program for nikon's called toneup . a whooping 20 dollars and is based on the math used for Capture

With my Fuji i generally use Photoshop as the software from Fuji is really poor )IMHO.

With my beginning students i avoid the discussion about RAW as most of them just want to take better family pics. With the Intermediate classes we go into greater detail about RAW; both pros and cons and then they can decided for themselves.

For some folks the downside is the sizes of the files, storage and PP; however, for me, it is the only way i want to work .

RAW is my format of choice and I use the photoshop RAW converter.

I use the Photoshop RAW processor.

Still trying to get my hand around Lightroom.

Friends don't let friends shoot Jpeg.

Shooting JPEG is kind of: shooting film, have it processed in the lab, getting the CD with the scans but leaving the film there so they will throw it to the trashcan... A little bir harsh but this is what I exactly feel about it.

I only shoot RAW.
I use the Canon DPP software to view and select shots and then either convert them to TIFFs with it, or use Photoshop to process them.
Tom

I shoot raw for everything, but "grip&grin" type of snapshots. Process in Lightroom.

I shoot raw if only so I'll have an untouched original. Lightroom v2 is said to have a completely nondistructive workflow, but I've not used it beyond a month w/ the beta.

When I *did* have a dslr, I shot raw and processed in Capture one LE then catalogued in iView Mediapro. I much prefer Capture One to Lightroom or ACR

When I *did* have a dslr, I shot raw and processed in Capture one LE then catalogued in iView Mediapro. I much prefer Capture One to Lightroom or ACRWhy did you think Capture 1 was better? And Which version of ACR are you comparing it to?

Don

Don

I've done a direct comparison of Capture One and ACR 4.6 with Leica M8 files and the C1 results are a lot better - smoother, better NR in C1 and less destructive sharpening, to my eye. I haven't bothered doing a comparison with Canon files, as I am generally pretty happy with ACR for them.

Generally, i use jpe format b/c it's so much faster for me and the results are acceptable for my needs...

I don't enjoy the post-processing aspect of RAW - chiefly b/c i don't how to use software very well and am not as interested to learn it as i should be. Unfortunately, the distaste for post-processing carries over to when i am scanning negatives, despite owning a reasonably nice dedicated neg scanner.

ufraw

With my digital cams I always shoot RAW unless I'm taking pics of my wifes relatives. :)