View Full Version : Ektar or Portra 160NC for scanning fashion
sperera
03-04-2010, 04:56 AM
Hi there, got an important fashion shoot coming up and I'm debating whether to use Ektar 100 or stick with Portra 160NC....how do they compare for scanning......? I know and use Portra but am wondering whether this latest film is easier to scan....the scanning is crucial for me......
pellicle
03-04-2010, 07:17 AM
I advise to stick with what you know
I find that Portra is a nice film to scan too, but never tried the new Ektar ... shouldn't be any drama ... you scanning youself?
Loris Medici
03-04-2010, 07:32 AM
Do photogs still use film for fashion shoots!? Wow!
Just asking because I wondered: What equipment will you be using? Is it an outdoor shoot or indoor/studio shoot? I'd convert to "tethered digital" for indoor/studio shoots; looks much more interactive/productive. I'd like to know what keeps you with film? (*In the sole context of* fashion photography. Others, don't get me wrong.)
BTW, I highly agree with the advice: "stick to what you know"...
Regards,
Loris.
sperera
03-04-2010, 10:55 AM
I advise to stick with what you know
I find that Portra is a nice film to scan too, but never tried the new Ektar ... shouldn't be any drama ... you scanning youself?
I have my own ScanMate 5000 drum scanner yes.....
IanMazursky
03-04-2010, 11:05 AM
Do photogs still use film for fashion shoots!
I know quite a few who use film for fashion photography.
A few even shoot it at fashion week in NYC. They shoot a few hundred rolls of e6 or c41 during that week.
Some of it using what you know but its a look that a lot of people still prefer.
I would stick with Portra for the shoot.
The colors are truer and the saturation is normal compared to ektar.
sperera
03-04-2010, 11:05 AM
Do photogs still use film for fashion shoots!? Wow!
Just asking because I wondered: What equipment will you be using? Is it an outdoor shoot or indoor/studio shoot? I'd convert to "tethered digital" for indoor/studio shoots; looks much more interactive/productive. I'd like to know what keeps you with film? (*In the sole context of* fashion photography. Others, don't get me wrong.)
BTW, I highly agree with the advice: "stick to what you know"...
Regards,
Loris.
Hi, I'm not a famous fashion photographer shooting for a famous title like Vogue or Elle but to me its an important shoot.
Its for an advertising campaign (local area) for a shop called Aftershock London, the franchise shop in Gibraltar to be precise.
Shoot will be indoor in a luxury penthouse apartment. I will be using digital and film but want to choose the best scanning film with the best tonal range....i think I'll stick to what I know and love as you all say ....Portra 160NC.
I'm betting my wife, we work together on shoots, that the client will go for all the film shots over the digital.
As the main focus of the campaign will be internet marketing over point of sale posters etc the fact is, IRONICALLY, that I have found (this is my opinion) that film shots reduce to web site resolution retaining detail way better than digital shots does....
go figure, film beating digital in its own game
sperera
03-04-2010, 11:07 AM
absolutely.....there's a UK photographer I know of who ONLY uses film and he's working all the time. He gets booked for the look of film....
http://www.benmorrisphotography.co.uk/fashionoverview
I know quite a few who use film for fashion photography.
A few even shoot it at fashion week in NYC. They shoot a few hundred rolls of e6 or c41 during that week.
Some of it using what you know but its a look that a lot of people still prefer.
I would stick with Portra for the shoot.
The colors are truer and the saturation is normal compared to ektar.
sperera
03-04-2010, 11:14 AM
...furthermore, I will take another A12 loaded with Fuji 400H i think for some ambient shots without flash...
anyone care to comment on 400 asa colour negative preferences?
I know quite a few who use film for fashion photography.
A few even shoot it at fashion week in NYC. They shoot a few hundred rolls of e6 or c41 during that week.
Some of it using what you know but its a look that a lot of people still prefer.
I would stick with Portra for the shoot.
The colors are truer and the saturation is normal compared to ektar.
David Luttmann
03-04-2010, 11:51 AM
I wouldn't use Ektar for anything involving skin tones. Portra is great....I prefer Fuji 160ProS or Fuji 400H.
sperera
03-05-2010, 06:35 PM
I have Fuji 400H but havent used it yet.....and Ive wondered about the 160ProS as well....perhaps you could post some comparison images if you have some time
I wouldn't use Ektar for anything involving skin tones. Portra is great....I prefer Fuji 160ProS or Fuji 400H.
Tony-S
03-06-2010, 09:55 PM
Not Ektar - it really isn't for people photography. It has quite a bit of red in skin-tones.
pellicle
03-07-2010, 08:06 AM
anyone care to comment on 400 asa colour negative preferences?
fuji Pro 400 ... but I'm a landscape sorta guy, with a funny scence of what's good looking
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4019/4413731276_f5dbe83d3d.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/pellicle/4413731276/)
so don't take my word for it ;-)
Sidney
03-08-2010, 02:13 PM
Do photogs still use film for fashion shoots!? Wow!
Two other photographers that still shoot ONLY film (C-41):
Xavier Vallhonrat (and only 4x5 inch, on top!)
http://www.top-fashion-photographers.info/javier-vallhonrat.html
and Vincent Peters, 6x7
http://www.vincentpetersphotography.com/
It's a pleasure see them work (plus the Fuji- Polas as reference), reminds me of my old days... :)
sperera
03-09-2010, 05:50 AM
fuji Pro 400 ... but I'm a landscape sorta guy, with a funny scence of what's good looking
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4019/4413731276_f5dbe83d3d.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/pellicle/4413731276/)
so don't take my word for it ;-)
BEAUTIFUL SHOT MAN......STUNNING
sperera
03-09-2010, 05:52 AM
THANKS FOR THE LINKS....THEY INSPIRE ME!
Two other photographers that still shoot ONLY film (C-41):
Xavier Vallhonrat (and only 4x5 inch, on top!)
http://www.top-fashion-photographers.info/javier-vallhonrat.html
and Vincent Peters, 6x7
http://www.vincentpetersphotography.com/
It's a pleasure see them work (plus the Fuji- Polas as reference), reminds me of my old days... :)
sperera
03-09-2010, 05:56 AM
sorry, what do you mean by this?: "(plus the Fuji- Polas as reference)[/QUOTE]
Don Bryant
03-09-2010, 10:33 AM
Hi there, got an important fashion shoot coming up and I'm debating whether to use Ektar 100 or stick with Portra 160NC....how do they compare for scanning......? I know and use Portra but am wondering whether this latest film is easier to scan....the scanning is crucial for me......
Both scan well. I wouldn't worry about using one or the other.
Don Bryant
David Luttmann
03-09-2010, 11:02 AM
Both scan well. I wouldn't worry about using one or the other.
Don Bryant
While they will both scan fine....Ektar is a bit saturated in red for skin tones. The portra has a nice warm color slightly favoring the magenta.
TareqPhoto
03-10-2010, 11:07 AM
Hey,
I am very very new to film and i really would like to have something with it in the future, i am digital guy but really film tweaking my mind a lot lately say since last year.
For my new start, i just received my second developed color neg roll yesterday after my first fail roll, i scanned 2 or 3 frame out of the roll, but i uploaded only one shot, can't be sure if it is great or not, but so far i can say that film look is different and even the color looks natural more than digital[didn't have test shots of film and digital but first look can tell], what do you think?
Out of scan with no prcoessing
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/7189/originalds.jpg
after color correcting only
http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/2239/shota.jpg
After more processing [color shift of blue/green on hair, sharpness]
http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/6817/shotb.jpg
sperera
03-10-2010, 12:37 PM
dontcha just love the look of film brother.........
Hey,
I am very very new to film and i really would like to have something with it in the future, i am digital guy but really film tweaking my mind a lot lately say since last year.
For my new start, i just received my second developed color neg roll yesterday after my first fail roll, i scanned 2 or 3 frame out of the roll, but i uploaded only one shot, can't be sure if it is great or not, but so far i can say that film look is different and even the color looks natural more than digital[didn't have test shots of film and digital but first look can tell], what do you think?
Out of scan with no prcoessing
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/7189/originalds.jpg
after color correcting only
http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/2239/shota.jpg
After more processing [color shift of blue/green on hair, sharpness]
http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/6817/shotb.jpg