Members: 5,079   Posts: 21,016   Online: 63
      
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    19

    Scanning transparencies

    I've been going crazy trying to scan transparencies for a long time, and always with mixed success.

    I use a Microtek i800 and Silverfast Ai Studio.

    If I scan in 48->24 bit or in 48-bit, I can get much more accurate color rendition from my slide. But I get absolutely horrid highlight and shadow detail.

    On the other hand, if I scan in 48-bit HDR, I get all the shadow and highlight detail I want most of the time, but the color is terrible and nearly uncorrectable in PS.

    I've found Astia to be the hardest to scan, but all slide films I've used (Velvia, Fortia, 64T) have had the same issues.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    andalucía · españa
    Posts
    163
    I've had the Canon 9950F with SilverFast. Scanning with SF delivered colors way off the originals. ScanGear was slow and lousy, so I sold the Canon and bought a Coolscan without SilverFast. Now everthing with NikonScan is absolutely perfect.

    In short words: I've had only bad experiences with Silverfast.
    Don't dream your life - live your dream.
    I'm using FILM because nature isn't made of squares.

 

 
DPUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.  |   All Content Copyright 2011 Photocentric Ltd.
Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  |   Search  |  Mobile     Facebook     Twitter     Linkedin     RSS