Members: 5,079   Posts: 21,016   Online: 68
      
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Scaaning fluid

  1. #1
    mrred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    70

    Scaaning fluid

    Does anyone know the correct PH a fluid should be for a wet scan?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Istanbul, Turkey
    Posts
    509
    I don't think scanning fluid has a pH value, since it doesn't contain any water. (pH is meaningful only for water solutions conceptually, right?) Isn't scanning fluid a petroleum based volatile liquid?

  3. #3
    mrred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    70
    Quote Originally Posted by Loris Medici View Post
    I don't think scanning fluid has a pH value, since it doesn't contain any water. (pH is meaningful only for water solutions conceptually, right?) Isn't scanning fluid a petroleum based volatile liquid?
    PH is for anything that contains Hydrogen. Yes they usually contain petroleum (naphtha). I am trying to formulate something worth while as good scanning fluids go for a kings ransom. I am just covering all bases.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Istanbul, Turkey
    Posts
    509
    I see...

    BTW, as a note: Probably you have to find something that has the same refractive index as emulsion (or very close to it) in order to eliminate (or to not accentuate) scratches...

    Good luck!

    Regards,
    Loris.

  5. #5
    Don Bryant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,405
    Quote Originally Posted by mrred View Post
    PH is for anything that contains Hydrogen. Yes they usually contain petroleum (naphtha). I am trying to formulate something worth while as good scanning fluids go for a kings ransom. I am just covering all bases.
    pH is for anything that has OH ions or dissolved hydrogen ions if I recall correctly.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    76
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by mrred View Post
    PH is for anything that contains Hydrogen. Yes they usually contain petroleum (naphtha). I am trying to formulate something worth while as good scanning fluids go for a kings ransom. I am just covering all bases.
    Don Bryant, you are technically right, you need H3O+ and OH- ions for a meaningful pH value. However, organic acids do dissolve in oil and act as acids on anything which is at least moist, so I could image an effective pH value defined for such a setup. No idea how I would measure of fine tune this (as AFAIK most pH test strips or electrodes require aqueous solution) or which value would be ideal for film scanning fluids. I'd assume that pH of 7 can't be too wrong, since the water for washing film ideally has pH of 7.

  7. #7
    pellicle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    767
    someone with more chemistry knowledge may wish to correct this, but according to my memory of CH103 at Uni in the 80's it was something like:

    pH is defined as the negative log to base 10 of the hydrogen ion activity in an aqueous solution.
    Homepages: here
    Blog: here

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    8
    not sure about pH,

    but there are many users of the Aztek KAMI mounting fluid, I've used it on a friend's Nikon 9000 with the wet-mount adapter and it didn't harm the film in any way. the scans were very nice though, much better than the dry scans. better shadow detail, less grain(almost none from 6x7 e100g @3200dpi), and there was less dust too!

    just takes more time.

    read more about it .. its the Kami SMF 2001

    http://aztek.com/consumables.html

    -Dan
    People ask how many megapixels my camera is; I reply with a cool "200" or so :)

  9. #9
    mrred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    70
    Quote Originally Posted by danielstone View Post
    not sure about pH,

    but there are many users of the Aztek KAMI mounting fluid, I've used it on a friend's Nikon 9000 with the wet-mount adapter and it didn't harm the film in any way. the scans were very nice though, much better than the dry scans. better shadow detail, less grain(almost none from 6x7 e100g @3200dpi), and there was less dust too!

    just takes more time.

    read more about it .. its the Kami SMF 2001

    http://aztek.com/consumables.html

    -Dan
    That's what started me on this. They expect me to pay a lot of $$ for what appears to be nothing more than lighter fluid (naphtha) in a pretty bottle. I have an old (1930-40) pub that used an ammonia based concoction for fluid mounts in enlargers.

    There is no way this should be an expensive endevor.

    So far my tray consists of an 8x10 sheet of plain glass suspended on scanner bas glass by some cardboard strips to raise it to 1mm (optimal for my 4490). I have a better-scanning MF ANR glass to go on top of the sandwiched neg. This idea is mostly from comments from S.K. on PN.

    All that is left is a good fluid concoction. I just have to find something that will work and not damage my pyro negs.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Grass Valley, CA
    Posts
    2
    mrred, I appreciate your parsimonious nature. It would be silly to pay $80 for two quarts of lighter fluid; however, if there is a reason the solution costs that much, than I'm willing to pay it. Aztek is not the only one selling Scanner Mounting Fluid and Optically Clear Mylar kits. Check out Scanscience.com. I'm with you about protecting my pyro negs from destructive solutions and will post anything new that I learn. I'm looking for a source for .001" optically clear Mylar. Any leads?
    Photodana

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
 

 
DPUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.  |   All Content Copyright 2011 Photocentric Ltd.
Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  |   Search  |  Mobile     Facebook     Twitter     Linkedin     RSS