Members: 5,079   Posts: 21,015   Online: 91
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Don Bryant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,405

    Nikon Fires back

    For all of you Nikon users:
    http://www.dpreview.com/news/0708/07082312nikond3.asp

    Nikon finally announced a FF DSLR.

    Don Bryant
    Last edited by Don Bryant; 08-23-2007 at 09:32 AM. Reason: Removed HTML Tags

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    andalucía · españa
    Posts
    163
    Nikon finally announced a FF DSLR.
    So what? The world keeps spinning around in the same direction, it'll change NOTHING.

    If you are a sports photographer, it **might** help you to catch this one and only decisive moment.

    Any shitty MF camera with a good lens and a slide film will deliver more quality if digitized with a hi res scanner like the Coolscan 9000 or Imacon.

    For 35mm I still prefer my F4s because it still feature zero time lags at start up, shooting sequences, etc.

    I don't understand who is firing what. In my eyes it'll remain a pimple counting for good pimples, hot pimples, bad pimples, color fringing pimples and you know what else

    Oh, btw, though I am a Nikon fan, you might be interested in this:

    http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/150-...lar-camera.htm
    http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/filmdig.htm
    http://www.kenrockwell.com/olympus/trip-35.htm

    just my two cents
    Don't dream your life - live your dream.
    I'm using FILM because nature isn't made of squares.

  3. #3
    Don Bryant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,405
    Quote Originally Posted by jens g.r. benthien View Post
    So what? The world keeps spinning around in the same direction, it'll change NOTHING.

    If you are a sports photographer, it **might** help you to catch this one and only decisive moment.

    Any shitty MF camera with a good lens and a slide film will deliver more quality if digitized with a hi res scanner like the Coolscan 9000 or Imacon.

    For 35mm I still prefer my F4s because it still feature zero time lags at start up, shooting sequences, etc.

    I don't understand who is firing what. In my eyes it'll remain a pimple counting for good pimples, hot pimples, bad pimples, color fringing pimples and you know what else

    Oh, btw, though I am a Nikon fan, you might be interested in this:

    http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/150-...lar-camera.htm
    http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/filmdig.htm
    http://www.kenrockwell.com/olympus/trip-35.htm

    just my two cents
    My post wasn't intended to be an invitation to Film vs. Digital discussion. It's purpose was meant for those interested in Nikon DSLRs.

    Me? I'm a Canon user but shoot film mostly. So let's not start these type of discussions.

    If it does devolve into a Film vs. Digital diescussion I'll ask the moderators to lock the thread.

    Thanks,

    Don

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Asheville, North Carolina
    Posts
    219
    Images
    2
    How do I change the white balance on the Kodachrome 64 in my leica m7?

    Quote Originally Posted by jens g.r. benthien View Post
    So what? The world keeps spinning around in the same direction, it'll change NOTHING.

    If you are a sports photographer, it **might** help you to catch this one and only decisive moment.

    Any shitty MF camera with a good lens and a slide film will deliver more quality if digitized with a hi res scanner like the Coolscan 9000 or Imacon.

    For 35mm I still prefer my F4s because it still feature zero time lags at start up, shooting sequences, etc.

    I don't understand who is firing what. In my eyes it'll remain a pimple counting for good pimples, hot pimples, bad pimples, color fringing pimples and you know what else

    Oh, btw, though I am a Nikon fan, you might be interested in this:

    http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/150-...lar-camera.htm
    http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/filmdig.htm
    http://www.kenrockwell.com/olympus/trip-35.htm

    just my two cents

  5. #5
    jd callow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    773
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by clay View Post
    How do I change the white balance on the Kodachrome 64 in my leica m7?
    Get a colour meter, take a reading and use the recommended filtration and adjust exposure to compensate for the filter factor -- easy as pie.

    I'd love the D300for all the things I need quick and good, the D3 is over kill for my needs. FWIW I much prefer Nikons and own an FE2 that I use on occassion.

  6. #6
    Don Bryant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,405
    Quote Originally Posted by clay View Post
    How do I change the white balance on the Kodachrome 64 in my leica m7?
    DXO Optics Pro provides quite a few different film profiles you can choose from including K64!

    Don

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Suth'n NY state
    Posts
    101
    Images
    3
    Hey Don, thanks for posting that. Looks like a nice addition for Nikon. I still
    use film, mostly MF, and I still love my old film Nikon and have some nice
    lenses for it. At some point I know I'll add a DSLR to my bag, probably Nikon
    because of my lenses, so this is interesting news to me.

    Susan

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    42
    Images
    1
    Thanks for the link Don, interesting stuff.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    andalucía · españa
    Posts
    163
    Don, my apologies, I didn't want to start a digital - analog discussion either. Just wrote my opinion.

    I'm sure all analog photograhpers are watching the development of the so called 'new technology' to a certain extent.

    In the case of Nikon they have done a great job to cover all media and news, like Apple used to do with the iPhone.

    Unless any manufacturer will present a d-cam with 22 MP full format and great dynamic range for an affordable price, I just read the headlines and skip the rest, because none of the new stuff can do anything better than I can do with my 'olde & outdated' equipment.

    Instead of DXO you can check LightZone which gives you the same features with a much more simplified GUI for the 'traditional' photographer. It's based on Zones, gives you tools for white points and color correction, etc. The basic version already is very impressive if you don't shoot 800 images per day. LightZone is - IMHO - the very fist real digital darkroom for photographers who know what they want to achieve.
    Don't dream your life - live your dream.
    I'm using FILM because nature isn't made of squares.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    North York, Ontario, CANADA
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by clay View Post
    How do I change the white balance on the Kodachrome 64 in my leica m7?
    Buy an M8?

 

 
DPUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.  |   All Content Copyright 2011 Photocentric Ltd.
Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  |   Search  |  Mobile     Facebook     Twitter     Linkedin     RSS