Members: 5,078   Posts: 21,011   Online: 88
      
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Oban, west coast of Scotland
    Posts
    37

    Photo Rag 308gm with Epsons

    Hey folks. I plan to order a new A3 printer this week and am looking at the
    R1400 or R1800.

    So far it comes down to this:
    1400 is considerably cheaper and with a CIS will be a very cheap run, no paper roll however.
    1800 has a roll feed but I am not keen on the gloss optimiser as I print on matt papers. with a CIS it will be a little cheaper to run and the price I can get one for is not hugely more than the 1400.

    Now I can live without the Roll feed to be honest, thing is, and this may be the real deal breaker, which one(if any) will print 308 photo rag?
    Anyone here have one of these printers to let me know first hand, I cannot find a definitive answer on any of the reviews I have read and epson simply say no to both printers.

    I had a 1290s before this and that printed the 308 fine despite being good only to about 285gm in the manual!!

    Any help appreciated

    cheers
    Gari

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    188
    Technically the r1800 will not feed a paper that is so thick, if the 1400 has the same paper path, then I wouldn't recommend either printer. You really need a mostly straight through path for that paper, which would mean the 2400 or larger.

    Also be aware that because the 1400 is a dye ink printer, the third party inks may not last as long as the Epson inks. Testing would need to be done before commiting to those inks.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Tunbridge Wells, UK
    Posts
    16
    Hi Garri

    my advice would be to take a long hard look at your budget and think seriously about the 4800.

    I have a 2100 and a 7800 and I now just use the 2100 for printing out correspondence and internet stuff, it makes me wince when I think what I paid for the machine and how much I've paid for ink since.

    the 4800 (and up) take the larger 110 and 220 ml cartridges which negate the need for a CIS, the machines are much better built than the smaller ones, built to last I suppose you could say, the canned profiles are pretty damn good straight out of the box, the 3rd party profiles are good too, I could go on and on

    seriously, I know it looks expensive on day one but trust me it makes up for it in the long run

    hope this helps

 

 
DPUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.  |   All Content Copyright 2011 Photocentric Ltd.
Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  |   Search  |  Mobile     Facebook     Twitter     Linkedin     RSS