Members: 5,075   Posts: 20,997   Online: 83
      
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    38

    Anyone else hate the word "hybrid"?

    While it is nice to have a forum for discussing the topic of analog + digital = heaven, I'm not sure I can ever warm up to being known as a "hybrid" photographer.

    Of course, I would hate to be known as a "digital" photographer just as well! In fact, being known as an "analog" photographer could be just as damning. (how about just "art" photographer ?)

    Anyone else care to comment? Why are labels so important? Do we even need one?
    J Michael Sullivan
    Editor/Publisher, MAGNAchrom
    www.magnachrom.com

  2. #2
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    New York, New York
    Posts
    198
    Images
    2
    I'm okay the term "hybrid," but one expression that I can't stand is "digital darkroom." It's a "computer workstation," thank you very much.

    I agree that it's probably best not to label photographers "hybrid," "analog," or "digital," but do I think it is important to label the work as such as a way to educate the general public about the media in question.

  3. #3
    dmr
    dmr is offline
    dmr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Somewhere in Middle America
    Posts
    30
    Uh, the term does seem a bit awkward -- at first -- but I really can't think of a better one. Things like "bimodal" come to mind, but that's even more awkward than "hybrid" is.

    I even question some of the usage of "analog" in referring to non-digital film photography. (Hey, to question is the answer, right?)

    I know that I fall into the group who uses film to shoot, but computers to scan and print.

    And no, I never use the term "digital darkroom" even though I sometimes work in here with the overhead light off.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1
    ABSOLUTELY NOT !!

    Even though the original strains should be preserved, in biology we engineer hybrids to improve quality and productivity. Why should image creativity be restrained?

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Eastern Australia
    Posts
    251
    Images
    20
    i don't like any distinguishing of the different forms of photography, we are all photographers, artists and image makers

    and, as much as it seems to agrieve many on apug, digital is imaging and is deserving of attention

  6. #6
    Don Bryant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,405
    Quote Originally Posted by MAGNAchrom View Post
    While it is nice to have a forum for discussing the topic of analog + digital = heaven, I'm not sure I can ever warm up to being known as a "hybrid" photographer.

    Of course, I would hate to be known as a "digital" photographer just as well! In fact, being known as an "analog" photographer could be just as damning. (how about just "art" photographer ?)

    Anyone else care to comment? Why are labels so important? Do we even need one?
    I'm okay with it. But here are some phrases that I'm not:

    Light Room vs darkroom

    Carbon Pigmented or Carbon Prints - for inkjet prints.

    Image Capture vs expose

    Don Bryant

  7. #7
    tom_micklin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA USA
    Posts
    105
    Images
    19
    I don't mind the term. It seems to fit what we're all doing relative to what APUG is all about.
    But then the only thing I do digitally is scan film and make enlarged negatives.
    Tom

  8. #8
    Digidurst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    32
    I think maybe that hybridphoto.com is a bit easier to type than someweirddigitalprocess.com would be. Nottolabelthissitebutithastodowithimages.com seems a little iffy too.

    We gotta call it something!

  9. #9
    wclavey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    7
    Images
    1
    I guess I'm not that picky... I appreciate having a place to discuss these techniques and I not that concerned about the name, although I don't think that "HP" is nearly as good of an acronym as "APUG" is. I also don't mind "digital darkroom" and I expect that is becuase I do a lot of other digital work, where "digital" is used to distinguish it from the traditional process, primarily, music editing - - making 3-5 minute compositions from much longer pieces for dancers, figure skaters, dog or horse freestylers, etc.

    But I have to say, I had quite a chuckle over: Nottolabelthissitebutithastodowithimages.com
    Last edited by wclavey; 10-26-2006 at 05:44 PM. Reason: grammar
    Westley

    35mm: OM-2, Kodak Retinette
    120: Mamiya c3 & c220, Bronica s2a, Ansco Speedex 4.5 Special
    4x5: Crown Graphic

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by wclavey View Post
    I guess I'm not that picky... I appreciate having a place to discuss these techniques and I not that concerned about the name, although I don't think that "HP" is nearly as good of an acronym as "APUG" is. I also don't mind "digital darkroom" and I expect that is becuase I do a lot of other digital work, where "digital" is used to distinguish it from the traditional process, primarily, music editing - - making 3-5 minute compositions from much longer pieces for dancers, figure skaters, dog or horse showers, etc.

    But I have to say, I had quite a chuckle over: Nottolabelthissitebutithastodowithimages.com
    How about "ADD" - Analog Digital Darkroom?
    ---------------
    B&D :cool:
    Rochester, NY
    ---------------
    Prefer TMAX & Tri-X film for capture
    Digi capture: Canon S80 and Nikon D100

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
 

 
DPUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.  |   All Content Copyright 2011 Photocentric Ltd.
Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  |   Search  |  Mobile     Facebook     Twitter     Linkedin     RSS